INNOVATIVE MACROMANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY

Authors

  • Srdjan Milićević Metropolitan University in Belgrade, Faculty of Management, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Vladimir Kostić Academy technical educational study Section Vranje, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Maja Stošković Privredna chamber Serbia, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59864/Oditor12403M

Keywords:

knowledge economy, innovation macromanagement, NIS, spiral models of knowledge creation and innovation

Abstract

After explaining the key postulates of the knowledge economy paradigm, the paper looks at the importance of unifying national policies of scientific, technological and industrial development in the form of innovative macro-management. A review has been made on the instruments offers demands and protection using which the entrepreneurial state works on the promotion national innovation Authors represent the opinion that the main building block of innovation macro-management is the concept of the national innovation system (NIS), whereby the unification platform activities academic community economy state and society represent so called spiral models innovation Base these model makes learning communicating and cooperation as a fundamental social process, on the one hand, and the growing network of activities of all participants in the creation of new knowledge and especially in the commercial valorization of knowledge into innovations, on the other hand.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atkison R., & Ezzel S. (2014). Economics innovation - the race for global advantage Zagreb: MATE.

Beraha I., & Đuričin S. (2022). Perspective development innovative system Republic of Serbia Belgrade: Institute economic science

Carayannis E., Barth, T., & Campbell, D. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship 1(1), 2.

Carayannis E., & Campbell, D. (2006). Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion and Use in Innovation Networks and Knowledge Clusters: A Comparative Systems Approach Across the United States, Europe and Asia. Westport: Praeger.

Cvetanović, S. & Novaković I. (2018). Macroeconomics and macroeconomic management Belgrade: Academy business professional study

Cvetanović S. (2002). Politics economic development Niš Economically college

Drašković M. (2010). Knowledge like unlimited resource and object management Montenegrin Journal of Economics. No. 11, 83-90.

Drucker, P. (1964). The Practice of Management London: Heron Books Ltd.

Djuricin S., & Beraha I. (2021). Assessment of the Innovation Capability of Business Entities in the Republic of Serbia. Finance, Innovation and Technology: new models and structures Institute of Economics - Ss. Cyril & Methodius University: 179-198.

Etzkowitz H., & Leydesdorff L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ''Mode 2'' to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations, Research Policy 29.

Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class New York: Basic Books.

Fagerberg, J. (2001) Economic Growth and Convergence, in M. Warner (ed.), International Encyclopedia of Business & Management London Thomson Learning: 1547-1554.

Fagerberg. J., & Verspagen B. (2009). Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field, Research Policy 38 (2) 218–233.

Freeman C. (1987). Technology and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan London: Frances Pinter.

Freeman, C. (1995). The National System of Innovation in Historical Perspective Cambridge Journal of Economics. 19, 5–24.

Huggins, R., & Izushi H. (2007). Competing for Knowledge: Creating, Connecting and Growing London: Routledge

Godin, B. (2006a). The Knowledge-Based Economy: Conceptual Framework or Buzzword? The Journal of Technology Transfer 31 (1), 17–30.

Godin, B. (2006b). The linear model of innovation: The historical construction of an analytical framework. Science, Technology, & Human Values 31(6), 639-667.

Ješić J. (2015). Quad model spirals (quadruple helix model) as basis national innovative system Doctoral dissertation Sremska Kamenica University Educons

Leković V. (2018). Economy knowledge as a new socio-economic paradigm development Republic of Serbia Implications economy knowledge for development processes in the Republic of Serbia Kragujevac: Economic college University of Kragujevac p. 39 -52.

Leydesdorff L., & Meyer, M. (2006). Triple Helix Indicators of Knowledge-Based Innovation Systems. Research Policy vol. 35, no. 10.

Lucas, R. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. 22 (1), 3-42.

Lundvall, B. (ed.) (1992). National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning London: Pinter Publishers.

Mazzucato M., & Semieniuk G. (2017). Public financing of innovation: new questions, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1) 24–48.

Mazzucato M. (2014). The Entrepreneurial State Debunking Public vs. Private Sector Myths Anthem. London: Anthem Press.

Miletić A., Trajković S., Mrdak G. (2021), Impact strategist determinations on the relationship between management innovation portfolio of success Auditor 7 (1), 165 – 179.

Nelson, R. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis New York: Oxford University Press.

Nelson, R. & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change Harvard University Press.

Nijkamp, P. & Siedschlag I. (ed.). (2011). Springer.

Osborne, D., Gaebler T. (2000). Public Management Reform Oxford University Press.

Perez, C. (2010). Technological revolutions and techno-economic paradigms. Cambridge Journal of Economics 34 (1), 185-202.

Pokrajac, S., (2016). Management Belgrade: Faculty of Magic in Belgrade.

Romer, P. (1986). Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. Journal of Political Economy (94 (5), 1002-1037.

Schultz, T. (1981). Investing in People: The Economics of Population Quality. Berkeley: University of California Press

Schrempf, B., Kaplan, D., & Schroeder, D. (2013). National, Regional, and Sectoral Systems of Innovation–An overview, Report for FP7 Project Progress. European Commission

Soete L. (2010). Systems of Innovation. In BH Hall and N. Rosenberg (eds.), Economics of Innovation Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Schwartz J. (2009). Croatia in society knowledge disputes and perspectives invasive politics Zagreb: Školska a book

Wickham, P. (2001). Strategic Entrepreneurship: A decision-making approach to new venture creation and management London: Prentice Hall.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Milićević , S., Kostić, V., & Stošković, M. (2024). INNOVATIVE MACROMANAGEMENT IN THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY. Oditor, 10(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.59864/Oditor12403M

Similar Articles

1-10 of 99

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.