ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN SERVICE LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59864/Oditor72501ZVKeywords:
artificial intelligence, law enforcement, police forecasting, facial recognition, biometric techniquesAbstract
Artificial intelligence has recently been intensively pushing the boundaries of human civilization and technological development. As a technological achievement, it imperceptibly "sneaked" into the life of every individual and became an integral part of all spheres of social life. In the application of artificial intelligence today, it seems that we cannot shake the impression that what at one point seemed possible in 100 years, has in fact become a reality in the last 10 or so years. The need for legal regulation and legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence arises as an important issue for its future development for the benefit of the human community and the entire humanity. This research is part of a broader picture of the potential use of artificial intelligence in certain branches of law, aimed at looking at the special "interregnum" between the established practice of using artificial intelligence and its legal regulation. In the work, we focus in particular on the analysis and research of the use of artificial intelligence systems in the field of law enforcement. More precisely, we will shed light on the regulatory process related to artificial intelligence in the EU and point out the specifics of its use for security and police purposes, primarily by establishing restrictions for the benefit of the public and citizens, by categorizing the use of certain artificial intelligence systems as prohibited and high-risk. These are artificial intelligence systems that use prediction techniques, biometric surveillance, i.e. face recognition and derived biometric data. Their impact on human rights is the subject of special in-depth research outside this framework, bearing in mind that the uncontrolled use of these techniques as part of the artificial intelligence system today can be equated with the consequences of dropping an "atomic bomb" on human freedoms and rights.Apart from the regulatory process within the EU, we also point out the potential use of artificial intelligence in Serbia by law enforcement services through the analysis of the legal framework of the Republic of Serbia.
Downloads
References
Byrne W. H., T. Gammeltoft-Hansen. 2023. Untangling the Legal Infrastructure of Schengen. MOBILE Working Paper, No. 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/9h4e3
Codagnone C. et al., 2022. Identification and assessment of existing and draft EU legislation in the digital field. Study for the special committee on Artificial Intelligence in a Digital Age (AIDA). Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies. European Parliament, Luxembourg, doi: 10.2861/73141.
Council of Europe. 2023. Draft Framework Convention on artificial intelligence, human rights, democracy and the rule of law. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://rm.coe.int/-1493-10-1b-committee-on-artificial-intelligence-cai-b draft-framework/1680aee411)
Engel A. 2024. Facial Recognition Technologies in the Public Sector: Observations from Germany. Chapter. In The Cambridge Handbook of Facial Recognition in the Modern State, edited by Rita Matulionyte and Monika Zalnieriute, 186–97. Cambridge Law Handbooks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Euroactiv. 2024. Da li smo spremni za Veštačku inteligenciju? Indeks pokazuje da smo na 57. mestu, Srbija će uložiti 100 miliona evra. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://euractiv.mondo.rs/tehnologija/a6320/Da-li-je-Srbija-spremna za-vestacku-inteligenciju.htm)
Euroactiv. 2024a. Šta je "organizacija globalno partnerstvo za veštačku inteligenciju"? Srbiji donosi brojne benefite i razvoj tehnologije (dostupno na web sajtu: https://euractiv.mondo.rs/tehnologija/a6482/Sta-je-organizacija Globalno-partnerstvo-za-vestacku-inteligenciju-i-sta-znaci-za-Srbiju.html)
European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Regulation Of The European Parliament and of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. COM/2021/206 final.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (EU FRA). 2019. Facial recognition technology: fundamental rights considerations in the context of law enforcement. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://fra.europa.eu/sites/ default/files/fra_uploads/fra-2019-facial-recognition-technology-focus-paper 1_en.pdf )
European Western Balkans. 2023. Akt EU o veštačkoj inteligenciji će onemogućiti nekontrolisan biometrijski nadzor u Srbiji. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://europeanwesternbalkans.rs/akt-eu-o-vestackoj-inteligenciji-ce onemoguciti-nekontrolisan-biometrijski-nadzor-u-srbiji/
Evropski Parlament. 2024. Akt o umjetnoj inteligenciji. Zakonodavna rezolucija Europskog parlamenta od 13. ožujka 2024. o Prijedlogu uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o utvrđivanju usklađenih pravila o umjetnoj inteligenciji (Akt o umjetnoj inteligenciji) i izmjeni određenih zakonodavnih akata Unije (COM(2021)0206 – C9-0146/2021 – 2021/0106(COD)). P9_TA(2024)0138.
Friedl P., G.G. Gasiola. 2024. Examining the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act. VerfBlog. DOI: 10.59704/789d6ad759d0a40b (dostupno na web sajtu: https://verfassungsblog.de/examining-the-eus-artificial-intelligence-act/)
Fuster G.G. 2020. Artificial Intelligence and Law Enforcemen - Impact on Fundamental Rights. Study requested by the LIBE committee. doi:10.2861/ 880024
Garvie C., et al., 2016. The Perpetual Line-Up. Unregulated Police Face Recognition, Georgetown Law Center on Privacy & Technology. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.perpetuallineup.org/ )
Gikay A.A. 2023. Live Facial Recognition for Law Enforcement: The European Union’s Regulatory Approach Should be Informed by UK Police’s Practice. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/ 2023/11/live-facial-recognition-for-law.html )
Gikay A.A. 2023. Regulating use by law enforcement authorities of live facial recognition technology in public spaces: an incremental approach.” The Cambridge Law Journal 82, no. 3 (2023): 414–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0008197323000454
Hayes P. et al., 2020. Algorithms and values in justice and security. AI & SOCIETY 35: 533–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00932-9
Interpol&UNICRI. 2019. Artificial Intelligence and Robitics for Law Enforcement. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://unicri.it/artificial-intelligence-and robotics-law-enforcement)
Kremidas-Courtney C., H. Linderstal. 2023.The convergence of new technologies endangering human agency. Friends of Europe. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insights/the-convergence-of-new technologies-endangering-human-agency/ )
Madiega T., H. Mildebrath. 2021. Regulating facial recognition in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Services (EPRS). Brussels. DOI:10.2861/140928. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/ RegData/etudes/IDAN/2021/698021/EPRS_IDA(2021)698021_EN.pdf)
Maslej N. et al., 2024. The AI Index 2024 Annual Report. AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI. Stanford University, Stanford, CA. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/report/)
OECD 2024. OECD AI Policy Observatory. AI in Serbia (dostupno na web sajtu: https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/countries/Serbia )
OECD. 2022. Recommendation of the Council on Artificial Intelligence, OECD/LEGAL/0449. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://legalinstruments.oecd.org /en/instruments/oecd-legal-0449)
Perry L.W. et al., 2013. Predictive Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement Operations. Rand Corporation. ISBN: 978-0-8330-8148-3. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research _reports/RR233.html)
Prlja D., G. Gasmi., i V. Korać. 2021. Veštačka inteligencija u pravnom sistemu EU. Institut za uporedno pravo. Beograd. ISBN 978-86-80186-73-3
Reclaim your face. 2024. EU AI Act will fail commitment to ban biometric mass surveillance (Deutsche Version unten). (dostupno na web sajtu: https://reclaimyourface.eu/eu-ai-act-will-fail-commitment-to-ban-biometric-mass surveillance/)
Samoili S. et al., 2021. AI Watch. Defining Artificial Intelligence 2.0. Towards an operational definition and taxonomy for the AI landscape. Publications Office of the European Union. European Parliament, Luxembourg, doi:10.2760/019901.
Sánchez-Monedero J., L. Dencik. 2022. The politics of deceptive borders: ‘biomarkers of deceit’ and the case of iBorderCtrl. Information, Communication & Society. 25:3, 413-430. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1792530)
Share Fondacija. 2024. Usvojen AI Akt: Ljudska prava ostala u drugom planu. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.sharefoundation.info/sr/usvojen-ai akt-ljudska-prava-ostala-u-drugom-planu/)
Statewatch. 2023. Europe’s techno borders. EuroMed Rights & Statewatch. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.statewatch.org/publications/reports-and books/europe-s-techno-borders/ ).
Strategy for the development of artificial intelligence in the Republic of Serbia for the period 2020-2025., "Official Gazette of RS", no. 96/2019.
The China Academy of Information and Communications Technology. 2022. Artificial Intelligence White Paper. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://cset.georgetown.edu/wp-content/uploads/t0442_AI_white_paper_2022_ EN.pdf)
UNESCO. 2022. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137)
Vasilkov Z. 2023. Unutrašnji poslovi i bezbednost u pravu Evropske unije nakon Lisabonskog ugovora. Zadužbina Andrejević: Beograd. ISBN 978-86 525-0429-9
Wendehorst C., Y. Duler. 2021a. Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces. BRIEFING Requested by the JURI AND PETI committees Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 697.131 (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2021/697131/IPOL_BRI(202 1)697131_EN.pdf)
Wendehorst C., Y. Duler. 2021b. Biometric Recognition and Behavioural Detection Assessing the ethical aspects of biometric recognition and behavioural detection techniques with a focus on their current and future use in public spaces. European Parliament Study requested by the JURI AND PETI committees Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. doi: 10.2861/982599
White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2022. The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights: Making Automated Systems Work for the American People. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/ai-bill-of rights)
XReality Safety Intelligence (XRSI).2024. Biometrically-Inferred Data (BID). (dostupno na web sajtu: https://xrsi.org/definition/biometrically-inferred data-bid ).
Conclusion on the adoption of Ethical guidelines for the development, application and use of reliable and responsible artificial intelligence. Official Gazette of RS", No. 23/2023.
Zhang D. et al., 2022. The AI Index 2022 Annual Report. AI Index Steering Committee, Stanford Institute for Human-Centered AI, Stanford University. (dostupno na web sajtu: https://aiindex.stanford.edu/ai-index-report-2022/)
