ARE THE CAUSE OF THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION AND THE PURPOSE OF THE CONTRACT THE SAME?

Milan Ječmenić

doi:10.5937/Oditor2201134J

Authors

Milan Ječmenić „MB“ University, Faculty of Business and Law, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2201134J

Keywords:

cause of contractual obligation, purpose of contract, economic goal, sponsorship contract, image transfer

Abstract

The paper examines the relationship between the cause of the contractual obligation and the purpose of the contract. Namely, an attempt is made to answer the question, whether these are two different legal institutes, or if apart from terminology, there are no other differences between them. The problem is analyzed based on the sponsorship agreement. This contract was chosen due to one of its peculiarities. The economic goal of the sponsor is so obvious and visible, that, without any hesitation, one can think about applying the economic concept of the cause of the contractual obligation to this contract. If we take into account that we have a basis for such a thing in court practice (namely, there are decisions in which the economic concept of the cause of the contractual obligation is applied), as well as the fact that in domestic legal doctrine some authors define the purpose of the contract as an economic goal, the issue becomes obvious.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antić, Oliver. 2008. Obligaciono pravo. Beograd.

Antić, Oliver. 2006. „Pravno-teorijske osnove različitih shvatanja kauze“. Arhiv za pravne i društvene nauke br. 3-4.

Capri, Roberta., Tocci, Mario. 2007. Il contratto di sponsorizzazione. Trento.

Dudaš, Atila. 2011. „Kauza obligacionih ugovora“. Doktorska disertacija. Univezitet u Novom Sadu. Pravni fakultet Novi Sad.

Đurđević, Marko. 1994. „Raskidanje ili izmena ugovora zbog promenjenih okolnosti“. Magistarska teza. Univerzitet u Beogradu. Pravni fakultet Beograd.

Gams, Andrija. 1959. „Kauza i pravni osnov“. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu br. 2.

Grujić, Nenad. 2014. „Raskid ugovora zbog neispunjenja i pravna dejstva raskida“. Doktorska disertacija. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta Union u Beogradu.

Ječmenić, Milan. 2018. „Ugovor o sponzorstvu“. Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Kragujevcu. Pravni fakultet Kragujevac.

Jobber, David., Fahy, John. 2006. Osnovi marketinga. Beograd.

Kapor, Vladimir. 1951. „Neosnovano obogaćenje u građanskom pravu“. Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Beogradu. Pravni fakultet Beograd.

Mormando, Marco.1998. I contratti di sponsorizzazione sportive. Bari.

Nikšić, Saša. 2006. „Kauza obveze i srodni instituti u poredbenom pravu“. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Zagrebu br. 4.

Perović, Slobodan., Dragoljub, Stojanović. 1980. Komentar Zakona o obligacionim odnosima. Gornji Milanovac-Kragujevac.

Perović, Slobodan. 1981. Obligaciono pravo. Beograd.

Rohrborn, Stefan. 1997. Der Sponsoringvertrag als Innengesellschaft: Abschluß, Vollzug und Leistungsstörungen. Berlin.

Rudiger, Benjamin. 2010/2011. „Sponsoring und Vertragsrecht: Zur Frage der Definititon von Kommunikationserfolgen in Sponsoringvertragen“. Seminar zum Sportrecht bei Prof. Dr. Peter W. Heermann, LL.M., Wintersemester.

Šmalcelj, Želimir. 1966. „Djelovanje izmijenjenih okolnosti na obligatorne ugovore“. Naša zakonitost br. 2.

Šurbatović, Jovan. 2014. Menadžment u sportu. Beograd.

Tarner, Stjuart. 1994. Sve o sponzorstvu. Beograd.

Vedriš, Martin. 1987. „„Osnova“ po Zakonu o obveznim odnosima“. Privreda i pravo br. 7-8.

Vuković, Zoran. 2014. „Ugovori o stručnom angažovanju sportskih stručnjaka“. Doktorska disertacija. Univerzitet u Kragujevcu. Pravni fakultet Kragjevac.