ELEMENTS OF MULTIVARIATION ANALYSIS OF CRIME ON SCARCE MEETINGS

Dejan Jeremić; Ratomir Antonović; Slobodan Stanojević; Tomislav Radović

doi:10.5937/

Authors

Dejan Jeremić Sequester Employment, Belgrade, Serbia Author
Ratomir Antonović Doctorate student, Foundation Support life, Belgrade, Serbia Author
Slobodan Stanojević Modern Business School, Belgrade Author
Tomislav Radović University John Nesbit, Faculty of management, Zaječar, Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5937/

Keywords:

Method, crime, control, analysis, factors and variables of crome, implicit knowledge, application, causes of crime

Abstract

Crime represents a harmful occurrence that is specific for each culture and socioeconomic formation. Due to this it is no surprise that there is an interst for crime in different areas of social sciences and life. Since crime is a burning topic of numerious scientific and expert analyses or researches, it can be concluded that it is an old mutual problem of all countries, old and new ones. It doesn’t depend only on the sociopolitical order, but economic development and characteristical social factors and circumstances that exist in respective countries as well.

Suprisingly large diversity of causes and circumstances that lead to the occurrence of crime demands a different approach to its research. It is possible and consists of the application of multivariate analysis, since it allows for many different ways of observing crime and taking more efficient actions aimed at its prevention and enabling of normal functioning and development of state and society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbot, J. L., Y. Park, & S. Parker. 2000. The effects of audit committee activity and independence on corporate fraud. Managerial Finance, 26(11): 55–67.

Bell, T., & J. Carcello. 2000. A decision aid for assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9(1): 169–178. Bell 1996.

Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests, Machine Learning, (45): 5–32.

Brown, A.S. (2008). To what extent does agricultural machinery maintenance pose clinical risk? Clinical Risk March 14, (2): 59-62.

Caffaro, F., Mirisola, A., Cavallo, E. (2017). Safety signs on agricultural machinery: Pictorials do not always successfully convey their messages to target users, Applied Ergonomics 58, (1): 156-166.

Cherkassky V., & F. M . Mulier. 2007. Learning from Data: Concepts, Theory, and Methods, 2nd edition, John Wiley - IEEE Press.

Cullinan, P. G., & G. S. Sutton. 2002. Defrauding the public interest: a critical examination of reengineered audit processes and the likelihood of detecting fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13(3): 297–310.

Cruz, A.M., Rincon, A.M.R. (2012). Agricultural machinery maintenance outsourcing: Have operation management research and management theories forgotten the medical engineering community? A mapping review. European Journal of Operational Research 221, (1): 186-197.

Green, B. P., & J. H. Choi. 1997. Assessing the risk of management fraud through neural-network technology. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 16(1): 8–28.

Maindonald J., & J. Braun. 2007. Data Analysis and Graphics Using R, 2nd Edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Milojević, I., Mihajlović, M., Cvijanović, M. (2012). Impact of organizational failure of relevance consolidated budget. Ekonomika poljoprivrede 59(1): 63-71.

Platt J. C. 1998. Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines, Technical Report MSR-TR-98-8, Microsoft Research.

Quinlan J. R. 1996. Bagging, Boosting and C4.5, in Proc. of AAAI-96 Fourteenth national Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, OR, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA.

Riveiro, J.A., Marey-Pérez, M.F., Díaz-Varelam, E.R., Álvarez, C.J. (2010). A methodology for the analysis of the relationships between farms and their physical environment. Journal of Agricultural Science 48, (2): 245-253.