SIGNIFICANCE OF APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL MODELS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RATING SYSTEM OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

Authors

  • Slobodan Šegrt Faculty of Business Studies and Law, University "Union - Nikola Tesla", Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Aca Ranđelović Faculty of Business Studies and Law, University "Union - Nikola Tesla", Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Dejan Đurić Ministry of Defense, Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59864/Oditor62402SS

Keywords:

default probability, debtor, models, internal rating, statistical analysis, adequacy of bank capital

Abstract

The most important system for managing risks and measuring financial performance is the rating system. The rating system is considered an integral part of banks' current operations and their risk management culture. All banks try to highlight its affiliation with current affairs, in order to show the supervisors the necessity of its use for the purpose of determining the minimum regulatory capital requirements.
The Committee in Basel for certain classes of exposure to risks recommends the use of a basic methodology where banking institutions use their own assessment of the risk of non-payment of debtors as an input, while assessments of additional risk factors are applied through the supervisor's standardized rules.
This basic methodology is available for banking institutions that have the ability to satisfy their supervisors that they are capable of meeting certain minimum requirements of the banking system, the risk management process and the ability to assess its essential components.
In addition to the basic methodology, advanced methodologies have also been defined that provide the possibility of internal assessment of risk components. Wide application of the aforementioned assessments is an important part of the dynamic and risk-sensitive IRB approach (Internal Rating Based). Thus, those banking institutions that have the ability to carry out a certain valid and quantified risk assessment can be identified and distinguished.
Some specific models, procedures and processes of assessing the probability of non-payment in certain situations, through the obtained results, enable the management of banking institutions to analyze in detail the real picture of possible debtors, which ultimately provides a possible better analysis of their default. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahams, T.O., Ewuga, S.K., Kaggwa, S., Uwaoma, P.U., Hassan, A.O., & Dawodu, S.O., (2024), Mastering compliance: a comprehensive review of regulatory frameworks in accounting and cybersecurity, Computer Science & IT Research Journal, 5(1), 120-140.

Abrahams, T.O., Farayola, O.A., Kaggwa, S., Uwaoma, P.U., Hassan, A.O., & Dawodu, S.O., (2024a), Reviewing third-party risk management: best practices in accounting and cybersecurity for superannuation organizations, Finance & Accounting Research Journal, 6(1), 21-39.

Alastair L., (2022), Masterning Risk Modeling, First Edition, London, England,

Alirezaie, M., Hoffman, W., Zabihi, P., Rahnama, H., & Pentland, A., (2024), Decentralized Data and Artificial Intelligence Orchestration for Transparent and Efficient Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Trade Financing, Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 17(1), 38.

Altman, E., & Sabato, G., (2007), Modeling Credit Risk for SMEs: Evidence from the US Market, Abacus, 43 (3), 323-357.

BCBS., (2006), International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.

Bessis J, (2019), Risc Management in Banking, Amacom, London,

Brealey R., (2021), Principles of Corporate Finance, Mc Grew-Hill, New Jork,

Crook, J.N., Edelman, D.B., & Thomas, L.C., (2007), Recent developments in consumer credit risk assessment, European Journal of Operational Research, 183 (3), 1447-1465

Daníelsson, J., & Macrae, R., (2021), Uthemann, A., Artificial intelligence and systemic risk, Journal of Banking & Finance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106290

Dowling E.T., (2017), Mathematical Methods for Business and Economics”, McGrow Hill, New York.

Engeimann B., Rauhmeier R.,(2018), The Basel II Risk Parameters Estimation, Validation and Stress Testing, Dresdner Bank, Berlin

Genest, B., & Brie, L., (2013), Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions: Demonstration and Analysis, Global Research & Analytics by Chappuis Halder & Cie .

Gitman L., (2019), Principles of Managerial Finance, Harper Collins Publishers, New Jork,

Greuning H., (2018), Analyzing and Managing Banking risk, Second Edition, The World Bank,

Hunt, W., Marshall, K., & Perry, R., (2020), Artificial Intelligence's Role in Finance and How Financial Companies are Leveraging the Technology to Their Advantage, Thesis. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.31982.64328

Matz L., (2017), Liquidity Risk Measurement and Management, John Wiley Sons,

Mishkin F., (2020), Banking and Financijal Market, Third edition, Collins Publishers,

Ochuba, N.A., Usman, F.O., Amoo, O.O., Okafor, E.S., & Akinrinola, O., (2024), Innovations in business models through strategic analytics and management: conceptual exploration for sustainable growth, International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 6(3), 554-566.

Samuels J., (2016), Management of company Finance, Champan&hall, London

Zhou, W., Yan, Z., & Zhang, L., (2024), A comparative study of 11 non-linear regression models highlighting autoencoder, DBN, and SVR, enhanced by SHAP importance analysis in soybean branching prediction, Scientific Reports, 14(1), 5905.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Šegrt, S., Ranđelović, A., & Đurić, D. (2024). SIGNIFICANCE OF APPLICATION OF STATISTICAL MODELS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE RATING SYSTEM OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS. Oditor, 10(2), 196-237. https://doi.org/10.59864/Oditor62402SS

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 138

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.