RECEPTION OF ROMAN LAW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor1901079ZKeywords:
Roman law, lawyers, reception, codification, code, laws, civil lawAbstract
The reception of Roman law is the acquisition (reciprocation) of Roman law and its use as a positive (valid) right in Europe in the Middle Ages and the New Century. This is a unique case in history, that the legal system of a civilization applies beyond its borders and after its collapse. Roman law was thus embedded in the very foundations of modern European law, and its influence was particularly reflected in the development of civil law and civil laws of European countries in the 19th century.
Roman law (ius Romanum, ius Romanorum) signifies the legal order that existed in the Roman state since its foundation (the founding of Rome in 754 BC) until the death of the Byzantine Emperor (Eastern Roman Emperor) Justinijan I in 565 AD . Justinian's codification - Corpus Iuris Civilis, a collection that was published between 529 and 534, in which all the creations and achievements of the Roman legal theory of the classical period (Roman "classical law") were collected and preserved, is the final stage in the development of the Roman rights. In the new century (somewhat sooner rather than later), reciprocated Roman law ceased to be a positive law in Europe, and it was replaced by civil codifications (civil codes): in France, in the time of Napoleon - Code Civile (Civil Code) made 1804 , in Austria, the General Civil Code of 1811, and in Germany the unique Civil Code of 1896. In the Principality of Serbia the first Civil Code was passed in 1844.
Downloads
References
Bardžić, Ž., Đurić, D., & Mrdić, U. (2017). Pravno-politička struktura Demokratske Republike Kongo. Oditor - časopis za Menadžment, finansije i pravo, 3(1), 52-69.
Bujuklić, Ž. (2018). Rimsko pravo u doktorskim tezama Nikole Krstića iz 1854. godine. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 66(3), 31-56.
Cvetković-Đorđević, V. (2015). Datio kao pretpostavka primene kondikcije u rimskom pravu. Teme, 39(4), 1341-1358.
Kurtović R., Ranđelović D., (2010) Recepcija rimskog prava i njegov uticaj na građansko pravo zemalja kontinentalne Evrope, Pravne teme, 3(5), str. 137-149.
Ilić, V. (2015). Recepcija dva rimska edikta u Srpski građanski zakonik. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 87(4), 195-206.
Ke, X. (2018) The pragmatic turn in law: Inference and interpretation in legal discourse, Journal of Pragmatics, 135(10), pp. 1-3.
Milošević M., Rimsko pravo, Beograd, 2010.
Marković, S. D. (2018). Kazna beščašća u rimskom pravu. Civitas, 8(2), 144-159.
Marković S., Opšta istorija prava I, Podgorica, 2008.
Perović, M. (2017). Novacija kao način prestanka obligacija. Anali Pravnog fakulteta u Beogradu, 65(3), 167-187.
Slavnić LJ., Istorija pravnih institucija, Privredna akademija, Novi Sad, 2008.
Stanković, E., & Vladetić, S. (2018). Univerzalnost pravila rimskog prava vezanih za institut službenosti. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Nišu, 57(79), 387-396.
Stanković, M. (2017). Regulisanje ugovora o građenju u nekim zemljama Evropske unije. Pravo - teorija i praksa, 34(10-12), 49-58.
Sič, M. I. (2015). Javnopravna pravila regulisanja vodovoda i snabdevanja vodom u starom Rimu. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta, Novi Sad, 49(3), 1081-1096.
Stanojević O., Rimsko pravo, Beograd, 2004.
Stojanović D., Antić O., Uvod u građansko pravo, Beograd, 2004.
Stefanović, N. (2018). Koncept svojine u rimskom pravu. Pravo - teorija i praksa, 35(4-6), 17-29.
Stefanović, N. (2018). Originarno sticanje svojine u rimskom pravu. Pravo - teorija i praksa, 35(10-12), 46-58.
Hanson J. (2018) Precautionary Principle: Current Understandings in Law and Society, Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 4, pp. 361-366
Vuletić, V. (2015). Pretor ne štiti kukavice - o dvostrukom karakteru prinude u rimskom i savremenom domaćem pravu. Teme, 39(2), 445-466.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
