LEGAL ASPECTS OF FIGHTING CYBER CRIME IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5937/Oditor2301017BKeywords:
European law, cybercrime, personal dataAbstract
The development of information technologies and the Internet and the commission of criminal acts in this new environment leads to the emergence of transnational, high-tech crime. Competent bodies for the fight against crime are hindered in achieving results by the traditional division into national jurisdictions, while there are no such restrictions for perpetrators. Cyber activities cause great damage and consequences to natural or legal persons, illegally appropriate financial resources and protected data. The specificities of high-tech crime require the specialization of state authorities because in the fight against crime, individual rights, privacy and freedoms of individuals must not be jeopardized. The aim of this paper is to show how the legislation of the European Union (EU) and the activities of its institutions improve the prevention, investigation and prosecution of perpetrators and build capacities in the judiciary. Harmonization of domestic law with EU law in the field of combating cybercrime is provided for in Chapter 24 of the "Justice, Freedom, Security" negotiations. In answering the question of what are the legal aspects of combating cybercrime in the EU, historicalcomparative, content analysis and deductive methods were used.
Downloads
References
Bada M, Nurse J. 2019. Developing cybersecurity education and awareness programmes for small- and medium-Sized enterprises (SMEs). Inf. Comput. Secur. 27(3): 393–410. doi:10.1108/ICS-07-2018-0080
Bejatović S., 2012. Visokotehnološki kriminal i krivičnopravni instrumenti suprotstavljanja, Zbornik radova Međunarodna naučnostručna konferencija „Suzbijanje kriminala i evropske integracije, s osvrtom na visokotehnološki kriminal“, Visoka škola unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srpske: 17- 30 (dostupno na: http://education.muprs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/12/Zbornik-Visokotehnoloski-kriminal.pdf)
Bjelajac Ž., A.Filipović. 2021. Specific characteristics of digital violence and digital crime, Law theory and practice (4): 16 – 32
Branicki LJ, Sullivan-Taylor B, Livschitz SR. 2018. How entrepreneurial resilience generates resilient SMEs. Int. J. Entrep. Behav. Res. 24(7): 1244– 63. doi:10.1108/IJEBR-11-2016-0396
Carrapico H., A. Barinha.2018. European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field, Symposium: European Union cyber security as an emerging research and policy field, European Politics and Society, 19 (3): 299-303
Csonka P. 2006. The Council of Europe's Convention on cyber-crime and other European initiatives, Revue international de droit penal, 3-4 (77): 473 - 501
Darijević V. 2021. Sajber kriminal kao bezbednosni rizik na internetu, Megatrend revija, 2(18): 257-266
De Hert, P., G. González Fuster, B-J. Koops. 2006. Fighting cybercrime in the two Europes, The added value of the EU framework decision and the council of Europe Convention, Revue internationale de droit pénal 3-4 (77): 503-524
Đukić A. 2018. Organizovani visokotehnološki kriminal – pojam, razvoj i osnovne karakteristike, Vojno delo (3):128-156
Harris MA, Patten KP. 2014. Mobile device security considerations for small- and medium-Sized enterprise business mobility. Inf. Manag. Comput. Secur. 22(1): 97–114. doi:10.1108/IMCS-03-2013-0019.
Jerman-Blažić, B., T. Klobučar, J. Stefan.2016.Missing Solutions in the Fight against Cybercrime and Cyberterrorism – the New EU Research Agenda, European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference (dostupno na web sajtu:
Krivokapić, D. i A. Petrovski.2016. Sajber kriminal u Srbiji pred otvaranje poglavlja 24 (Pravda, sloboda i bezbednost), Share fondacija (dostupno na web sajtu: https://bezbednost.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/06/sajberkriminalusrbijipredotvaranje poglavlja.pdf)
Nedeljković, S. i B. Forca. 2015. Evropska strategija bezbednosti i sajber pretnje – značaj za Srbiju, Vojno delo 3: 135-155
Newbury M. 2017. Designated non-financial businesses and professions: the weak link in Australia’s AML/CTF regime. J. Money Laund. Control. 20(3): 247–61. doi:10.1108/JMLC-08-2016-0038.
Nikodinovska-Stefanovska, S. i M. Đurovski.2012. Unutrašnja bezbednost EU i policijska saradnja u postlisabonskoj eri, u Zborniku radova Međunarodna naučnostručna konferencija „Suzbijanje kriminala i evropske integracije, s osvrtom na visokotehnološki kriminal“, Visoka škola unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srpske: 385 – 395 (dostupno na: http://education.muprs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/12/Zbornik-Visokotehnoloski-kriminal.pdf)
Pernik, P. 2014. Improving Cyber Security: NATO and the EU International Centre for Defence Studies (dostupno na web sajtu: https://icds.ee/wpcontent/uploads/2010/02/PiretPernik-ImprovingCyberSecurity.pdf)
Perović, M. 2018. Sajber kriminal kao globalna prijetnja u svijetu, Vojno delo 3: 157-164
Romić, M. i N. Grbić-Pavlović. 2012. Međunarodnopravni dokumenti kojima
se uređuje oblast visokotehnološkog kriminla u zborniku radova Međunarodna naučnostručna konferencija „Suzbijanje kriminala i evropske integracije, s osvrtom na visokotehnološki kriminal“, Visoka škola unutrašnjih poslova Republike Srpske: 193-217 (dostupno na: http://education.muprs.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/12/Zbornik-Visokotehnoloski-kriminal.pdf)
Savić, A., Fabjan, M. i Trnavac, D. 2021. Komparativna analiza makroekonomskih pokazatelјa u procesu ekonomske tranzicije u zemlјama Centralne i Istočne Evrope, „Oditor“ Časopis za menadžment, finansije i pravo, Br. 1, 23-44.
Wennerström E. 2010. EU-legislation and Cybercrime: A Decade of European Legal Developments, Stockholm Institute for Scandianvian Law, 47-21: 452- 472 (dostupno na web sajtu: https://scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/47-21.pdf)
Woschke T, Haase H, Kratzer J. 2017. Resource scarcity in SMEs: effects on incremental and radical innovations. Manag. Res. Rev. 40(2): 195–217. doi:10.1108/MRR-10-2015-0239.
